FeedbackMagic Start the 7-day free trial

Compared July 27, 2026 · prices read off Marker.io's own pricing page

Feedback Magic vs Marker.io

Marker.ioFeedback Magic
Covers, of our six surfacesVisual annotation and bug reports — 2 of 6All six
Cheapest paid plan$39/mo Starter (yearly; $59 monthly), up to $149/mo Team$29/mo Starter · $79/mo Pro
What you are billed onSeats, projects, and page views — 5k/mo on Starter, 25k/mo on TeamFlat — nothing is metered

Marker.io and Feedback Magic overlap on one thing: letting somebody point at a problem on a page instead of describing it. On that surface they are excellent and more established than we are.

The difference is scope and meter. Marker.io does visual bug reporting. We do that plus surveys and CSAT, a changelog, a public voting board and testimonial collection, in one dashboard on one bill. And their plans count page views — 5,000 a month on Starter — so a client site that gets popular costs you more even if nobody files a single report.

The honest case for them

If visual bug reporting is genuinely all you need, read the section below before choosing us. Their Agency plan is real and it is good value at 50 projects.

The honest case for us

You are paying for one of six surfaces. If you also want a changelog your users actually read, a roadmap they can vote on, or testimonials with consent recorded at submission, you are looking at another subscription for each — and our whole argument is that four dashboards and four invoices is the expensive part, not the sticker price of any one of them.

Where Marker.io is the better choice

Written by us, about a competitor, because a comparison that wins every row is worth nothing to the person reading it.

Try it

Seven-day free trial, no card. If Marker.io is the better fit for what you need, the section above says so.

Start the free trial → See all six vendors compared →